Wednesday 25 February 2015

Multiple Comparisons-- ANOVA

Multiple Comparisons
Time2
Tukey HSD





(I) Treatment2
(J) Treatment2
Mean Difference (I-J)
Std. Error
Sig.
95% Confidence Interval
Lower Bound
Upper Bound
TOK drug
WT Drug
.03850
.18514
.997
-.4797
.5567
Tok control
-.37650
.18514
.209
-.8947
.1417
WT control
-.39600
.18514
.175
-.9142
.1222
WT Drug
TOK drug
-.03850
.18514
.997
-.5567
.4797
Tok control
-.41500
.18514
.146
-.9332
.1032
WT control
-.43450
.18514
.121
-.9527
.0837
Tok control
TOK drug
.37650
.18514
.209
-.1417
.8947
WT Drug
.41500
.18514
.146
-.1032
.9332
WT control
-.01950
.18514
1.000
-.5377
.4987
WT control
TOK drug
.39600
.18514
.175
-.1222
.9142
WT Drug
.43450
.18514
.121
-.0837
.9527
Tok control
.01950
.18514
1.000
-.4987
.5377



The table Multiple Comparison demonstrates which type of treatment of candida varies from each other. A Tukey post-hoc test is used. It can be seen in the table below that no difference exists between the Tok drug and WT drug (p = 0.997, p < 0.05), as well as between the Tok control and Wt control (p = 0.146).Thus, there is no differences between the Tok drug and WT drug vs Tok control and Wt control. 

0 comments:

Post a Comment