Time	1	2	3	4	5	6	Average	STDev		Time	1	2	3	4	5	6	Average	STDev
0	0.101	0.12	0.1	0.138	0.089	0.116	0.111	0.017546		0	0.107	0.107	0.1	0.167	0.084	0.109	0.112	0.028324
60	0.147	0.1	0.132	0.182	0.09	0.176	0.138	0.038065		60	0.161	0.098	0.165	0.207	0.086	0.16	0.146	0.045622
120	0.225	0.102	0.148	0.234	0.097	0.216	0.170	0.062727		120	0.238	0.104	0.239	0.264	0.089	0.183	0.186	0.074483
180	0.362	0.106	0.153	0.355	0.107	0.257	0.223	0.118275		180	0.381	0.106	0.389	0.399	0.093	0.191	0.260	0.146266
240	0.75	0.108	0.165	0.515	0.123	0.296	0.326	0.257313		240	0.624	0.111	0.613	0.573	0.117	0.208	0.374	0.25377
300	0.828	0.11	0.174	0.69	0.133	0.329	0.377	0.30845		300	0.867	0.112	0.851	0.756	0.198	0.204	0.498	0.361321
360			0.192				0.192			360			1.059				1.059
WT  Ethanol										ΔTOK Ethanol
Time	1	2	3	4	5	6	Average	STDev		Time	1	2	3	4	5	6	Average	STDev
0	0.106	0.104	0.1	0.145	0.089	0.109	0.109	0.019031		0	0.112	0.099	0.1	0.169	0.098	0.109	0.115	0.027311
60	0.153	0.136	0.165	0.195	0.138	0.291	0.180	0.05865		60	0.165	0.133	0.169	0.22	0.154	0.254	0.183	0.04532
120	0.238	0.218	0.271	0.3	0.271	0.495	0.299	0.100266		120	0.259	0.239	0.265	0.343	0.278	0.693	0.346	0.173563
180	0.41	0.379	0.462	0.52	0.409	0.743	0.487	0.134853		180	0.451	0.419	0.453	0.588	0.458	0.715	0.514	0.114654
240	0.677	0.638	0.711	0.785	0.699	1.037	0.758	0.145066		240	0.598	0.711	0.707	0.858	0.493	1.015	0.730	0.185522
300	0.951	0.877	0.977	1.051	0.971	1.133	0.993	0.088231		300	1.032	0.93	0.965	1.125	1.068	1.121	1.040	0.080447
360			1.199				1.199			360			1.186				1.186
WT  Control										ΔTOK Ethanol
Time	1	2	3	4	5	6	Average	STDev		Time	1	2	3	4	5	6	Average	STDev
0	0.108	0.108	0.098	0.144	0.09	0.115	0.111	0.018609		0	0.109	0.106	0.098	0.177	0.101	0.111	0.117	0.029793
60	0.163	0.137	0.164	0.212	0.134	0.28	0.182	0.055709		60	0.169	0.171	0.164	0.254	0.156	0.254	0.195	0.04625
120	0.249	0.223	0.278	0.329	0.245	0.517	0.307	0.10926		120	0.275	0.283	0.278	0.395	0.322	0.478	0.339	0.082094
180	0.454	0.393	0.473	0.562	0.385	0.759	0.504	0.140236		180	0.457	0.466	0.473	0.67	0.457	0.734	0.543	0.125085
240	0.742	0.684	0.733	0.84	0.746	1.084	0.805	0.145836		240	0.744	0.784	0.733	0.958	0.495	1.067	0.797	0.198544
300	1.039	0.96	1.018	1.133	1.086	1.197	1.072	0.08496		300	1.06	1.066	1.018	1.25	1.101	1.191	1.114	0.088351
360			1.246				1.246			360			1.246				1.246
					Average WT			Average ∆TOK					STDev WT			STDev ∆TOK
				Time	Drug+Ethanol	Ethanol	Control	Drug+Ethanol	Ethanol	Control		Time	Drug+Ethanol	Ethanol	Control	Drug+Ethanol	Ethanol	Control
				0	0.111	0.109	0.111	0.112	0.115	0.117		0	0.018	0.019	0.019	0.028	0.027	0.030
				60	0.138	0.180	0.182	0.146	0.183	0.195		60	0.038	0.059	0.056	0.046	0.045	0.046
				120	0.170	0.299	0.307	0.186	0.346	0.339		120	0.063	0.100	0.109	0.074	0.174	0.082
				180	0.223	0.487	0.504	0.260	0.514	0.543		180	0.118	0.135	0.140	0.146	0.115	0.125
				240	0.326	0.758	0.805	0.374	0.730	0.797		240	0.257	0.145	0.146	0.254	0.186	0.199
				300	0.377	0.993	1.072	0.498	1.040	1.114		300	0.308	0.088	0.085	0.361	0.080	0.088
				360	0.192	1.199	1.246	1.059	1.186	1.246		360

	WT			∆TOK
Time	Drug+Ethanol	Ethanol	Control	Drug+Ethanol	Ethanol	Control
0	0.1	0.1	0.098	0.1	0.1	0.098
60	0.132	0.165	0.164	0.165	0.169	0.164
120	0.148	0.271	0.278	0.239	0.265	0.278
180	0.153	0.462	0.473	0.389	0.453	0.473
240	0.165	0.711	0.733	0.613	0.707	0.733
300	0.174	0.977	1.018	0.851	0.965	1.018
360	0.192	1.199	1.246	1.059	1.186	1.246

Drug	30mg in 1ml= 0.2M.  50µl in the cronical flask
	Flask conc. 100mM	200mM

Control expriment (This is to see how candida albican grows)
Time	WT	∆TOK
0	0.110	0.102
60	0.137	0.140
120	0.224	0.221
180	0.378	0.368
240	0.582	0.581
300	0.938	0.934
360	1.222	1.233

	WT			∆TOK
Time	Drug+Ethanol	Ethanol	Control	Drug+Ethanol	Ethanol	Control
0	0.101	0.106	0.108	0.107	0.112	0.109
60	0.147	0.153	0.163	0.161	0.165	0.169
120	0.225	0.238	0.249	0.238	0.259	0.275
180	0.362	0.41	0.454	0.381	0.451	0.457
240	0.75	0.677	0.742	0.624	0.598	0.744
300	0.828	0.951	1.039	0.867	1.032	1.06
360

	WT			∆TOK
Time	Drug+Ethanol	Ethanol	Control	Drug+Ethanol	Ethanol	Control
0	0.12	0.104	0.108	0.107	0.099	0.106
60	0.1	0.136	0.137	0.098	0.133	0.171
120	0.102	0.218	0.223	0.104	0.239	0.283
180	0.106	0.379	0.393	0.106	0.419	0.466
240	0.108	0.638	0.684	0.111	0.711	0.784
300	0.11	0.877	0.96	0.112	0.93	1.066
360

ANOVA 3

TOK Control vs Wt Control

Descriptives
Time
	N	Mean	Std. Deviation	Std. Error	95% Confidence Interval for Mean		Minimum	Maximum
					Lower Bound	Upper Bound
wt control	6	.6587	.43355	.17699	.2037	1.1136	.12	1.20
tok control	6	.4968	.37679	.15382	.1014	.8923	.11	1.07
Total	12	.5778	.39637	.11442	.3259	.8296	.11	1.20

ANOVA
Time
	Sum of Squares	df	Mean Square	F	Sig.
Between Groups	.079	1	.079	.476	.506
Within Groups	1.650	10	.165
Total	1.728	11

Here, p= 0.50 i.e. greater than 0.05, therefore, no difference is present between TOK Control and Wt Control.

TOK and WT Drug Vs TOK and WT Control

ANOVA
Time2
	Sum of Squares	df	Mean Square	F	Sig.
Between Groups	.992	3	.331	3.216	.045
Within Groups	2.057	20	.103
Total	3.049	23

Since p = 0.045, i.e. less than 0.05, thus a statistical significant difference is present between the groups. However, it is not known which of the particular groups differed. This can be easily found out using Multiple Comparisons table comprising the results of post-hoc tests.

ANOVA-- 2

Tok Ethanol Vs WT Ethanol

 (WT = wild type)

Descriptives
Time
	N	Mean	Std. Deviation	Std. Error	95% Confidence Interval for Mean		Minimum	Maximum
					Lower Bound	Upper Bound
wt ethanol	6	.4710	.34653	.14147	.1073	.8347	.11	.99
tok ethanol	6	.4880	.35107	.14333	.1196	.8564	.12	1.04
Total	12	.4795	.33270	.09604	.2681	.6909	.11	1.04

ANOVA
Time
	Sum of Squares	df	Mean Square	F	Sig.
Between Groups	.001	1	.001	.007	.934
Within Groups	1.217	10	.122
Total	1.218	11

The p= 9.34 which is quite greater than 0.05, and thus, there is no difference between Tok Ethanol and WT Ethanol. 

Multiple Comparisons-- ANOVA

Multiple Comparisons
Time2 Tukey HSD
(I) Treatment2	(J) Treatment2	Mean Difference (I-J)	Std. Error	Sig.	95% Confidence Interval
					Lower Bound	Upper Bound
TOK drug	WT Drug	.03850	.18514	.997	-.4797	.5567
	Tok control	-.37650	.18514	.209	-.8947	.1417
	WT control	-.39600	.18514	.175	-.9142	.1222
WT Drug	TOK drug	-.03850	.18514	.997	-.5567	.4797
	Tok control	-.41500	.18514	.146	-.9332	.1032
	WT control	-.43450	.18514	.121	-.9527	.0837
Tok control	TOK drug	.37650	.18514	.209	-.1417	.8947
	WT Drug	.41500	.18514	.146	-.1032	.9332
	WT control	-.01950	.18514	1.000	-.5377	.4987
WT control	TOK drug	.39600	.18514	.175	-.1222	.9142
	WT Drug	.43450	.18514	.121	-.0837	.9527
	Tok control	.01950	.18514	1.000	-.4987	.5377

The table Multiple Comparison demonstrates which type of treatment of candida varies from each other. A Tukey post-hoc test is used. It can be seen in the table below that no difference exists between the Tok drug and WT drug (p = 0.997, p < 0.05), as well as between the Tok control and Wt control (p = 0.146).Thus, there is no differences between the Tok drug and WT drug vs Tok control and Wt control.